Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 27 HP less power than Toyota Verso, but torque is 15 NM more than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 121 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 695 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1696 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 57 litres). In 5-seat version Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space (by 211 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |