Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 35 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Touran is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 121 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 466 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1523 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`179 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |