Volkswagen Touran 2003 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Touran is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 170 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 350 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 14.9 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.5 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Touran petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Volkswagen Touran equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Touran has 439 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`178 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |