Volkswagen Touran 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 170 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 350 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 14.9 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.5 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Touran petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Volkswagen Touran equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`178 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
| |