Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Volkswagen Golf 2017

 
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2020
Volkswagen Golf
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP310 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 seconds5.1 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 110 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.97.9
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway830 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.26 m
Width: 1.75 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 21 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres343 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1079 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 8 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The Volkswagen Golf may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`990
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 820018 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv