Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1125 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 51 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |