Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Renault Clio 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1125 litres | 1069 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`720 kg | 1`702 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`189 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 440 kg | 513 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |