Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015

 
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2020
Mazda 2
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP105 HP
Torque: 250 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds10.1 seconds
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 2, but torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.73.4
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1340 km on highway
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 145 mm (5.7 inches)143 mm (5.6 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.06 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Polo and Mazda 2 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1125 litres950 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 175 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`575
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 840010 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv