Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1125 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 21 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`180 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 530 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |