Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1125 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 21 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`620 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |