Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 437 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 23 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |