Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 35 NM less than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.57 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 354 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 106 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Juke, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |