Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo and Fiat Punto have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 20 NM less than Fiat Punto. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 49 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.86 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 297 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Punto, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |