Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Fiat Punto 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Fiat Punto
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 240 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.6 seconds
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo and Fiat Punto have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 20 NM less than Fiat Punto. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.3
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres49 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1190 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.86 m
Width: 1.65 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data297 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1080 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Punto.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Punto, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Fiat Punto has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv