Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo 2001 engine produces 36 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo 2005, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2005. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
900 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |