Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1015 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 40 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`645 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |