Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 130 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2003 engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 2005, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 2005. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2003 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 2003 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2003 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2003 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |