Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo 2001 and Volkswagen Polo 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1030 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo 2005 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo 2001 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo 2005. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo 2005 (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |