Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 112 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1015 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`575 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |