Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Ford Fiesta 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Ford Fiesta
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP80 HP
Torque: 112 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds13.2 seconds
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway880 km on highway
660 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres945 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 85 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Fiesta has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv