Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 72 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 104 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 7 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 8 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 175 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 980 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 95 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`445 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |