Volkswagen Polo 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo 2002 and Volkswagen Polo 2005 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo 2002 torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo 2002 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2002 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo 2002 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 2002 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2002 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |