Volkswagen Polo 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2002 - 2005
Skoda Fabia
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 55 HP65 HP
Torque: 106 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.5 seconds15.9 seconds
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.9
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway880 km on highway
670 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1030 litres1015 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight: 1`530 kg1`575 kg
Net weight:980 kg1`060 kg
Load capacity:550 kg515 kg
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Fabia has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv