Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2005 engine produces 36 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 2001, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 2001. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2005 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo 2005 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 2005 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`630 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |