Volkswagen Polo 2006 vs Volkswagen Golf 2004

 
Volkswagen Polo
2006 - 2009
Volkswagen Golf
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP102 HP
Torque: 153 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11.4 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 3 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
620 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m4.20 m
Width: 1.65 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1305 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better
Average price (€): 24002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv