Volkswagen Polo 2006 vs Volkswagen Golf 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 153 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 3 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
620 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1305 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |