Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1015 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`645 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`095 kg | 1`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |