Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 85 HP75 HP
Torque: 130 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds13.8 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1015 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 24001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv