Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 7 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 110 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |