Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo 2005 and Volkswagen Polo 2001 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
630 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 975 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo 2005 has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo 2005 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo 2001. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo 2005 (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`490 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |