Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 126 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds13.8 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.4
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1015 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 24001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv