Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Ford Fiesta
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP70 HP
Torque: 112 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds15.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, but torque is 6 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
670 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres945 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 85 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Fiesta has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv