Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Seat Ibiza 2006

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Seat Ibiza
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP75 HP
Torque: 112 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds13.2 seconds
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
670 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.95 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has 3 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 18001800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Seat Ibiza has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv