Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 19 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |