Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo 2005 and Volkswagen Polo 2002 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo 2005 torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 2002. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo 2002 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2005 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2002, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 2005 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2005 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |