Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Seat Ibiza 2002

 
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Seat Ibiza
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.9 Diesel
Petrol engines (Volkswagen Polo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Ibiza) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 55 HP64 HP
Torque: 108 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.5 seconds17 seconds
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 9 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.84.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km5.5 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
640 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.95 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres265 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 5 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`620
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20001400
Pros and Cons:
    Seat Ibiza has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv