Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Peugeot 107 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 112 HP more power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 157 NM more than Peugeot 107. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Polo is 54 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
882 litres | 712 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 46 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests, but Peugeot 107 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 107 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |