Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2009 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2009 engine produces 45 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 2009, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Volkswagen Polo 2009. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo 2009 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2009, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 2009 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |