Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo 2009 torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2009. Volkswagen Polo 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo 2009 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2009, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |