Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

 
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 180 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds14.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.33.8
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1360 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1550 km on highway1360 km on highway
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5901`644
Safety:
Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 44003600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Skoda Fabia has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv