Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Audi A1 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Diesel (Volkswagen Polo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi A1) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 11 HP less power than Audi A1, but torque is 20 NM more than Audi A1. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1550 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Caddy, Skoda Fabia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Audi A1 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Audi A1 2010 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Audi A1, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A1. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`490 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi A1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Audi A1 has
| |