Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1150 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`641 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |