Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |