Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 362 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |