Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 600'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Vento engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Sharan, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Vento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |