Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Seat Toledo 1995

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Seat Toledo
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 64 HP64 HP
Torque: 125 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.9 seconds17.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 1 NM more than Seat Toledo. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.06.0
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1140 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.32 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 18 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
762 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`500no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv