Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Vento have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 700'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |