Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Vento
1992 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 64 HP64 HP
Torque: 125 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.9 seconds18.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Vento have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.9
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1170 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.38 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
762 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv