Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Seat Cordoba
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 64 HP64 HP
Torque: 125 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.9 seconds16.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 3 NM less than Seat Cordoba.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.0
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1120 km on highway
910 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.14 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
762 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Seat Cordoba has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv