Volkswagen Polo 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1997

 
Volkswagen Polo
1998 - 1999
Seat Cordoba
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP75 HP
Torque: 140 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds16.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 25 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.09.1
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle490 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway650 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.14 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
762 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Seat Cordoba has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv