Volkswagen Polo 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 25 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.1 | |
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
762 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |