Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 1999 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo 1996 engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo 1999, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 1999. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo 1996 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1999, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo 1996 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1999. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 1996 is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 40 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 1999, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 975 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo 1996 has 210 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo 1999. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo 1999 (by 215 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo 1999, which means Volkswagen Polo 1996 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |