Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Vento 1993

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Vento
1993 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 135 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds14.6 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Vento have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 9 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.5 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
620 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years2 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.38 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Vento has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv