Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Toyota Avensis 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Toyota Avensis. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Avensis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Polo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Avensis 2009 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Avensis 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 56 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 509 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Avensis has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |